Should the US government adopt a zero tolerance policy?
In light of the financial, legal, and ethical obstacles to a zero tolerance policy, the U.S. government must more readily embrace ATDs. The options described in this paper should be explored and expanded by the administration on an urgent basis, and the administration should seek the active engagement of civil society.
Should we use a zero-tolerance approach to solve the border crisis?
He said that zero-tolerance approaches should only be used “when you have complete chaos, you have public disorder,” and “it should be considered a short-term policy.” Boyce said that the situation at the border is not comparable to that of New York City in the 1990s, and therefore a zero-tolerance approach isn’t as appropriate.
What does zero tolerance mean in court cases?
A past use case. What the zero-tolerance approach meant in that setting was that “whoever was cited for a violation, they got a summons,” which included anyone found with an open container, playing dice or gambling, or other offenses typically viewed as minor.
Do zero-tolerance policies work to keep schools safe?
While keeping our schools safe is a shared goal, zero-tolerance policies actually undermine that goal and often yield absurd results. Late last year, the York Dispatch described how two ten-year-olds were suspended after one used a folder as a fake gun to “shoot” at his friend, who retaliated by pretending to aim a bow and arrow.