Is Q6600 good for gaming?
Essentially it's not too bad- it's fast enough for most modern games with a budget card, although you probably want to overclock it if possible.
Is the Core 2 Quad q6600 good for games? | Tom's Hardware Forum
forums.tomshardware.com › threads › is-the-core-2-quad-q6600-good-for-...
Is Core 2 Quad Q9300 good for gaming?
Game benchmarks Let's see how good Core 2 Quad Q9300 is for a gaming PC, compared with system requirements of some popular titles. ... This processor matches 78% minimum and 68% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300: specs and benchmarks - Technical City
technical.city › cpu › Core-2-Quad-Q9300
Is Q8200 better than Q6600?
Q8200 does make more sense over all. I was under the impression that the higher multiplier of the Q6600 would outweigh the benefits of the Q8200, and it is indeed a factor in overclocking, but the newer production process and lower voltages should make for a better CPU overall.
Intel Core2 Quad: Q6600 vs Q8200 - Which is better? - Tom's Hardware ...
forums.tomshardware.com › threads › intel-core2-quad-q6600-vs-q8200-...
Is Core 2 Quad better than i7?
i7 possess more calculation power, although depending on shared L3 cache means more latency. For single cards, i7 amounts to a slight downgrade over current quads. For dual, i7's performance edge is significant. For quad, i7's lead becomes huge.
i7 vs. core 2 Quad | Tom's Hardware Forum
forums.tomshardware.com › threads › i7-vs-core-2-quad.252334