<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Why the Packers drafting Jordan Love doesn’t send the right message to the team]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/04/27/why-the-packers-drafting-jordan-love-doesnt-send-the-right-message-to-the-team/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/04/27/why-the-packers-drafting-jordan-love-doesnt-send-the-right-message-to-the-team/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/04/hi-res-21ac472a70e93445bc9bdf8d4d52e5ed_crop_north.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Why the Packers drafting Jordan Love doesn’t send the right message to the team</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retired NFL lineman Geoff Schwartz says the players in the Green Bay locker room know this isn’t a win-now move.</p><p>The first night of the 2020 <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl-draft">NFL Draft</a> was going smoothly. Way more smoothly than expected. You can even say 
it was boring. The first trade didn’t happen until pick No. 13, and it 
was Tampa moving up a single pick. Even the <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/las-vegas-raiders">Raiders</a> <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2020/4/24/21234099/nfl-draft-grades-2020-pass-fail-tua-dolphins-jordan-love-packers">overdrafting two players wasn’t a big story</a>.</p><p>Then, the <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/green-bay-packers">Packers</a> traded up.</p><p>And the Packers traded up for Utah State quarterback <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/players/277677/jordan-love">Jordan Love</a>.</p><p>Thank you, Packers, for the storyline of this year’s draft. <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2020/4/24/21233951/aaron-rodgers-jordan-love-green-bay-packers-nfl-draft-2020-trade-drama">We have you covered on what this pick means for Aaron Rodgers</a>, but I want to tell you how players in the locker room will feel about this move: They won’t like it.</p><h3 id="WQUiTb">The players know Love doesn’t help them win a Super Bowl this season</h3><p>While players aren’t involved in personnel decisions, we 
do understand what each draft pick means. We aren’t clueless to how the 
team is built. And the Packers drafting Love signals to the players that
 the team isn’t serious about making a run now.</p><p>The Packers were 13-3 last season and played in the NFC 
title game. Most would agree the 13-3 record was inflated by an easier 
schedule and some breaks. They didn’t dominate their opponents and won 
many of those games in ugly fashion. They were middle of the pack in 
scoring, total offense, and total defense. There was no metric where 
they really excelled.</p><p>However, players don’t worry about the numbers. They 
worry about wins, losses, and championships. And for veterans on the 
team, they understand the need for improving immediately to win a <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/super-bowl">Super Bowl</a>.</p><p>So imagine <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/193603/david-bakhtiari">David Bakhtiari</a>, <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/245400/corey-linsley">Corey Linsley</a>, Za’Darius Smith, and <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/254515/preston-smith">Preston Smith</a> settling into their favorite spot on the couch getting ready for the  draft. Some food, some beers, some family time. It’s getting close to  the Packers pick and boom, there’s a trade.</p><p>They’re probably thinking, “Oh, yes, we are getting that 
wide receiver to help the offense,” and then Roger Goodell says, “The 
Packers selected <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/players/304547/jordan-love">Jordan Love</a>.”</p><p>Love doesn’t help the team right away and the players 
KNOW that. A wide receiver? That would have helped the team. Rodgers 
made it clear he was hoping the team would give him a weapon in the 
first round. Players would take that as a message that winning NOW is 
important, not winning starting at the earliest in 2022.</p><p>Even worse is not only did the Packers not draft a wide 
receiver in the first round, they didn’t draft one at all. In the 
deepest WR draft in years! Instead, they only added a running back (<a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/players/287827/aj-dillon">AJ Dillon</a>) and tight end (<a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/players/272527/josiah-deguara">Josiah Deguara</a>) who probably aren’t going to help much in the passing game this season.</p><p>You’re welcome to make the argument that drafting Love 
puts notice on Rodgers, which it does, but Green Bay isn’t getting out 
of that contract anytime soon if the team even wanted to. Players know 
contracts. They understand Rodgers has a newish deal. The Packers are 
committed to him at least through 2022 if they don’t want to incur a big
 cap hit for releasing him. Could the Packers trade him? Of course. But 
when? To who? Who’s taking his deal?</p><p>Barring injury, Rodgers is still the Green Bay 
quarterback for the foreseeable future. Rather than get him the missing 
piece that could make them legitimate Super Bowl contenders, the Packers
 used their first-round pick on a quarterback who probably won’t see the
 field for a while. And by doing that, they let the current players know
 that a couple years from now is more important than the present.</p><h2 id="FpXT8a">There is no past example in NFL Draft history that compares</h2><p>Some might try to bring up the <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/kansas-city-chiefs">Chiefs</a>, who drafted <a href="https://dknation.draftkings.com/2019/8/29/20838560/patrick-mahomes-fantasy-football-dfs-salary-stats-2019">Patrick Mahomes</a> when they had <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/1839/alex-smith">Alex Smith</a>. Yes, they did.</p><p>However, <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/245875/alex-smith">Alex Smith</a> is not <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/308633/aaron-rodgers">Aaron Rodgers</a>. <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/players/79550/alex-smith">Smith</a> is not a two-time MVP and he was never leading the Chiefs to the Super 
Bowl, despite the team winning the division multiple times under Andy 
Reid. He had a career season in 2017 and promptly lost a home playoff 
game to the <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/tennessee-titans">Titans</a>. It made more sense the Chiefs were willing to move on from <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/players/280793/alex-smith">Smith</a> than the Packers are from Rodgers.</p><p>Also, LOVE IS NOT MAHOMES:</p><p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Patrick Mahomes<br>Total EPA: 98th percentile<br>Pass EPA: 96th<br>EPA/Play: 85th<br>Pass TDs: 93rd<br>Schedule: 46th<br><br>Jordan Love<br>Total EPA: 15th percentile<br>Pass EPA: 19th<br>EPA/Play: 6th<br>Pass TDs: 24th<br>Schedule: 24th<br><br>I get the point, but these two were on different stratospheres as prospects. <a href="https://t.co/RmlBEEyLkF">https://t.co/RmlBEEyLkF</a></p>&mdash; Hayden Winks (@HaydenWinks) <a href="https://twitter.com/HaydenWinks/status/1251701639183917056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> <p>This comparison is just lazy. The Packers drafted Love for at least a couple years in the future. The Chiefs started <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/286037/patrick-mahomes-ii">Mahomes</a> a year after he was drafted.</p><p>You might try to argue, “But Ge-off, the Packers did this before. They drafted Rodgers with <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/1941/brett-favre">Brett Favre</a> firmly in the quarterback position.” Yes, they did. And it worked — 15 years ago. Should the <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-england-patriots">Patriots</a> attempt to build their franchise around another sixth-round draft pick because <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/1653/tom-brady">Tom Brady</a> worked out?</p><p>The draft is about finding value. The Packers drafted 
Rodgers at No. 24 because he was projected to be the top pick in the 
draft and the value was there. Also, <a href="https://www.packers.com/news/ap-story-brett-favre-to-return-to-packers-in-2005-2458548">they expected Favre to retire fairly soon</a>, which he clearly didn’t do.</p><p>On the other hand, Love was pegged as the fourth-best QB 
this year, and many draft experts had a second-round round grade on him,
 maybe even lower by some. This is a succession plan for years from now,
 not something where the Packers think Rodgers is retiring soon.</p><p>I understand the idea of team-building far more than when
 I played. I’m OK with the concept of looking ahead, but in this league,
 I’m not sure that’s possible much anymore. It’s about winning now, 
especially in the locker room. The Love pick does not do that — and the 
players in that locker room know it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.022159099578857-->