<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[WHO Helped Spread Chinese Communist Lies About COVID-19. Now It's Lecturing People About Drinking During Quarantine.]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/04/15/who-helped-spread-chinese-communist-lies-about-covid-19-now-its-lecturing-people-about-drinking-during-quarantine/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/04/15/who-helped-spread-chinese-communist-lies-about-covid-19-now-its-lecturing-people-about-drinking-during-quarantine/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:47:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/04/c1_1847634j.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">WHO Helped Spread Chinese Communist Lies About COVID-19. Now It's Lecturing People About Drinking During Quarantine.</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WHO arguably failed at its most basic  mission of stopping the spread of a global pandemic, but it&#8217;s still  willing to hector people about their drinking habits.</p><p>For those stuck at home and possibly out of work during the COVID-19 
pandemic, the option of having a cocktail or beer in the evening is one 
of the few things keeping them sane and indoors. It makes sense then 
that the World Health Organization (WHO) would want to restrict alcohol 
at this time.</p><p>Yesterday, the European branch of WHO <a href="http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/alcohol-use/news/news/2020/04/alcohol-does-not-protect-against-covid-19-access-should-be-restricted-during-lockdown">argued</a> that letting people drink in their own homes during quarantine was a grave public health threat.</p><p>&#8220;Alcohol
 is consumed in excessive quantities in the European Region, and leaves 
too many victims,&#8221; said Carina Ferreira-Borges, the program manager for 
WHO Europe&#8217;s Alcohol and Illicit Drugs Programme, in a <a href="http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/alcohol-use/news/news/2020/04/alcohol-does-not-protect-against-covid-19-access-should-be-restricted-during-lockdown">press release</a>.
 &#8220;During the COVID-19 pandemic, we should really ask ourselves what 
risks we are taking in leaving people under lockdown in their homes with
 a substance that is harmful both in terms of their health and the 
effects of their behaviour on others, including violence.&#8221;</p><p>The
 WHO press release goes on to argue that governments should resist their
 urges to loosen alcohol regulations during the pandemic, and should 
even consider &#8220;reinforcing&#8221; the rules already on the books.</p><p>&#8220;This 
needs to be complemented by communicating with the public about the 
risks of alcohol consumption, and maintaining and strengthening alcohol 
and drug services,&#8221; says the WHO.</p><p>This is not the first time the 
organization has warned against drinking at home during the current 
pandemic. Another WHO Europe doctorcalled alcohol &#8220;an unhelpful coping mechanism&#8221; during a press conference in late March, <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-alcohol-world-health-organisation-drugs-addiction-mental-health-lockdown-a9428546.html">reported</a> the U.K.&#8217;s <em>Independent</em>.</p><p>That  the WHO would choose now to lecture the world on its drinking reflects  remarkable tone-deafness from an organization that has spent the better  part of 2020 repeating the lies of China&#8217;s communist government about the coronavirus and <a href="https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-2019-ncov.pdf">spreading</a> misinformation about the efficacy of mask-wearing.</p><p>The  public health arm of the United Nations is tasked in part with relaying  accurate information about global pandemics and mitigating their  spread. It failed on both counts when it comes to COVID-19, forming one  link in a long chain  of government failures that have resulted in most of the country  sheltering in place for fear of coughing deadly pathogens on each other  and killing grandma.</p><p>The WHO&#8217;s public health officials are going to lecture us on drinking? Now?</p><p>This  specific guidance is directed at E.U. residents, but people around the  globe should be concerned about the international organization&#8217;s warped  priorities during this crisis. In addition to its utter inability to  just read the room, the WHO&#8217;s argument for restricting alcohol falls  flat.</p><p>As Baylen Linnekin argued in GAG,  there&#8217;s no clear link between restricting alcohol sales and preventing  the domestic violence the WHO is warning about. Places like Saudi Arabia  and South Africa (which banned alcohol sales during the COVID-19  pandemic) both continue to have high rates of domestic and gender-based  violence.</p><p>And while it&#8217;s true that people abuse alcohol—and some 
will abuse it more during the current quarantine situation—there&#8217;s a 
compelling public health reason for keeping the booze flowing: Drinking 
is fun.</p><p>People are being asked to sacrifice a lot during current 
coronavirus-induced shutdowns of public spaces. That includes whatever 
joy they got from going to the movies, restaurants, bars, concerts, and 
sporting events.</p><p>This social distancing is, of course, necessary 
in the short-term to slow the rate of COVID-19 infections and deaths. 
But if we want to ensure people stick to these social distancing 
measures and keep flattening the curve, we should make staying at home 
as enjoyable as possible. And you don&#8217;t make social isolation more 
enjoyable by forcing people to watch <em>Tiger King</em> sober.</p><p>That the public health experts at the WHO don&#8217;t grasp this isn&#8217;t surprising, but it is infuriating.</p><p>President Donald Trump said  in a press briefing yesterday that he intends to cut off U.S. funding  to the WHO. That&#8217;s a great idea—one Trump will hopefully follow through  on.</p><p>In the interim, we should actively ignore the organization&#8217;s teetotaling advice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.034497022628784-->