<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Voyager defaults on $675M loan to 3AC; lawsuit follows]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2022/06/27/voyager-defaults-on-675m-loan-to-3ac-lawsuit-follows/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2022/06/27/voyager-defaults-on-675m-loan-to-3ac-lawsuit-follows/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2022/06/27/voyager-defaults-on-675m-loan-to-3ac-lawsuit-follows-2022-06-27-15-11-35.png" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Voyager defaults on $675M loan to 3AC; lawsuit follows</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has received a default notice from Voyager Digital Limited for failing to meet its loan commitments.</p>
<p>Voyager is entitled $15,250 Bitcoin (roughly $325 million at the current pricing) and $350 million USDC, according to the press statement. The company stated that it will take legal measures to reclaim the monies.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>&ldquo;Voyager intends to pursue recovery from 3AC and is in discussions with the Company&rsquo;s advisors as to legal remedies available.&rdquo;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h3>Looking for assistance from Alameda Research</h3>
<p>In reaction to the developing crypto deleveraging scenario, Voyager instituted a $10,000 customer withdrawal restriction on June 22.</p>
<p>Voyager had agreed to a rescue plan with Alameda to assist fulfill client liquidity demands during "this volatile era," according to its website. The rescue provided Voyager with $200 million in cash as well as 15,000 BTC in revolving loans and an unknown USDC value.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>&ldquo;Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc. (&ldquo;VDH&rdquo;), has entered into a definitive agreement with Alameda Ventures Ltd. (&ldquo;Alameda&rdquo;) related to the previously disclosed credit facility, which is intended to help Voyager meet customer liquidity needs during this dynamic period.&rdquo;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The bailout was subject to various restrictions, including the corporation receiving fresh money within 12 months. The most important of these was a $75 million withdrawal restriction over any 30-day rolling period.</p>
<p>The article further stated that the corporation had requested a $25 million USDC repayment by June 24 and the outstanding balance by June 27.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>&ldquo;Neither of these amounts has been repaid, and failure by 3AC to repay either requested amount by these specified dates will constitute an event of default.&rdquo;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h3>Will Voyager go through with it?</h3>
<p>Voyager reported that it is still fulfilling client purchases and withdrawals, thus far utilizing $75 million of the Alameda credit line.</p>
<p>Voyager CEO Stephen Ehrlich went on to say that the firm is striving to enhance its balance sheet and is looking at various ways to address liquidity needs.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>&ldquo;We are working diligently and expeditiously to strengthen our balance sheet and pursuing options so we can continue to meet customer liquidity demands.&rdquo;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>In a recent tweet, 8Blocks Capital CEO Danny Yuan made similar claims, saying 3AC had ghosted him.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">13) FWIW, for the most part, they aren't speculating with clients' money like Celsius was (maybe a thread another day about our dealings with them in 2019), however, here they did use our funds (~1m USD) to answer their margin calls.</p>
&mdash; Danny (@Danny8BC) <a href="https://twitter.com/Danny8BC/status/1537224406308597762?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 16, 2022</a></blockquote>
<p>
<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" async=""></script>
</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BH5-rSxilxo" frameborder="0" width="600" height="315"></iframe></p><script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam byFord]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.091193914413452-->