<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Trump not the first president to Halt US Funding for WHO]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/04/15/trump-not-the-first-president-to-halt-us-funding-for-who/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/04/15/trump-not-the-first-president-to-halt-us-funding-for-who/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/04/morning-top-5-trump-to-halt-us-funding-to-who-amid-coronavirus-crisis.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Trump not the first president to Halt US Funding for WHO</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a steady, dedicated effort can transform the World Health Organization into a force for good.</p><p>Somebody had to say it. Speaking at a press briefing on April 7,  President Trump chastised the World Health Organization (WHO) for <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/07/trump-blames-who-for-getting-coronavirus-pandemic-wrong-threatens-to-withhold-funding.html">having</a> “really called, I would say, every aspect of it [the coronavirus] wrong.”</p><p>Trump went further Tuesday evening, announcing that the US would place a hold on WHO funding over its handling of the novel coronavirus pandemic, <a href="https://www.axios.com/trump-world-health-organization-funding-65de2595-2d5e-4a6c-b7c6-9c18aa4cb905.html?fbclid=IwAR2Sa16CA32GdYLkecEe1k3rbZfOzYrSsAGiExfty10zU8We96-VEk8t0qQ">according to</a> Axios.</p><p>The United Nations sub-agency has indeed stumbled badly in its quest 
to contain the coronavirus, showing more of an interest in condoning 
cover-ups than producing accurate data. History has a strange way of 
repeating itself and the US faced a similar problem with another 
unaccountable global bureaucracy—the <a href="https://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm">International Labor Organization (ILO)—</a>in
 the 1970s. As it did then, the US must stem the flow of taxpayer 
dollars to the organization and demand accountability. Only a steady, 
dedicated effort can transform the WHO into a force for good.</p><p>It took three months, but the world finally knows the truth about the
 Chinese government’s flagrant attempts to cover up the coronavirus 
pandemic. Brave doctors such as Dr. Li Wenliang <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/03/asia/coronavirus-doctor-whistle-blower-intl-hnk/index.html">warned</a> his colleagues and the public via social media as early as December 
that patients were exhibiting mysterious SARS-like symptoms at his 
hospital in Wuhan. Dr. Li and some of his “co-conspirators” were <a href="https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-02-06/coronavirus-china-xi-li-wenliang">harassed</a> by the Chinese secret police for sounding the alarm and were threatened
 and forced to sign retractions. Meanwhile, the Hubei Provincial Health 
Commission <a href="https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/how-early-signs-of-the-coronavirus-were-spotted-spread-and-throttled-in-china">ordered</a> coronavirus lab samples destroyed and barred scientists from further testing samples.</p><p>Despite these cover-ups, China informed the WHO <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/02/01/early-missteps-state-secrecy-china-likely-allowed-coronavirus-spread-farther-faster/">about</a> the rapidly spreading virus on December 31. But the international 
agency sat idly by as the situation grew worse over the course of the 
next month. The Chinese government <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-who/advance-team-of-who-experts-arrives-in-china-to-probe-coronavirus-idUSKBN2041S9">refused</a> to let a WHO advance team into the country for two weeks. The global bureaucracy <a href="https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1217043229427761152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fworld%2Fworld-health-organization-january-tweet-china-human-transmission-coronavirus">uncritically reported</a> that Chinese authorities had seen &#8220;no clear evidence of human-to-human 
transmission of the novel coronavirus” on January 14, just one day after <a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-01-2020-who-statement-on-novel-coronavirus-in-thailand">acknowledging</a> the first case outside of China (in Thailand). WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus <a href="https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3050351/coronavirus-who-head-stands-his-praise-china-and-xi-jinping">praised</a> Chinese President Xi Jinping for his “political commitment” and 
“political leadership” despite these repeated, reprehensible attempts to
 keep the world in the dark about the coronavirus.</p><p>Evidently, the WHO cares more about maintaining delusions and 
cover-ups than rigorously collecting and reporting information on the 
coronavirus. Oxford-based “Our World in Data” <a href="https://fee.org/articles/oxford-based-group-stops-using-who-data-for-coronavirus-reporting-citing-errors/">announced</a> on March 18 that it would stop relying on coronavirus data from the WHO
 due to “many errors in the data…when we went through all the daily 
Situation Reports.” These data problems, coupled with the WHO’s failure 
to communicate with outside researchers about said errors, have led 
scientists affiliated with the project to instead use the more rigorous 
reporting of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control.</p><p>It’s little wonder that the Trump administration isn&#8217;t keen on continuing around $500 million in <a href="https://www.cfr.org/article/funding-united-nations-what-impact-do-us-contributions-have-un-agencies-and-programs">annual taxpayer aid</a> to a corrupt organization that can’t keep its numbers straight.</p><p>President Trump’s decision to withhold aid to an unaccountable global  bureaucracy may stem from an unlikely source of inspiration: former  President Jimmy Carter. The ILO was created in 1919, but by 1977, had  transformed from a worker advocacy organization to a mouthpiece for  backwards policies and oppressive regimes.</p><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><noscript><img src="https://fee.org/media/37160/carter.jpg?center=0.24739583333333334,0.71166666666666667&amp;mode=crop&amp;width=1920&amp;rnd=132313374770000000" alt=""/></noscript><img class="lazyload" src='data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=%22http://www.w3.org/2000/svg%22%20viewBox=%220%200%20210%20140%22%3E%3C/svg%3E' data-src="https://fee.org/media/37160/carter.jpg?center=0.24739583333333334,0.71166666666666667&amp;mode=crop&amp;width=1920&amp;rnd=132313374770000000" alt=""/><figcaption> Former  President Jimmy Carter</figcaption></figure><p>The Carter administration was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1977/11/01/archives/usreported-ready-to-leave-the-i-lo-carter-is-said-to-reach-decision.html">irked</a> by the brutal actions condoned by the ILO even as US taxpayers footed 
the bill for 25 percent of the agency’s financial dues (about <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1977/06/23/archives/secretary-of-labor-says-us-is-likely-to-quit-ilo-soon.html">$85 million</a> in today’s dollars). The bureaucracy would regularly find egregious 
labor violations committed by repressive governments, but the ILO buried
 the reports when the offending countries complained. US officials 
quickly put a kibosh on those activities by withdrawing from the ILO. 
The ILO quickly changed its ways and started to consistently call out 
the repression of workers. For example, in 1978 and 1979 the 
organization <a href="https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/338/5iie3322.pdf">condemned</a> brutal labor practices in Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union and 
sought to pivot itself as an impartial defender of workers around the 
world. The US <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=xObnQdGDSAAC&amp;pg=PA7&amp;lpg=PA7&amp;dq=international+labor+organization+too+close+to+the+soviet+union&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=Jr4WVvJLCU&amp;sig=ACfU3U1Yqaum8mGnue0kxiB8Diy9qUL97A&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiTmJag9djoAhV5lnIEHWRyBkcQ6AEwCHoECAwQLw#v=onepage&amp;q=international%20labor%20organization%20too%20close%20to%20the%20soviet%20union&amp;f=false">rejoined in 1980</a> and has retained an active role in the reformed global bureaucracy ever since.</p><p>There’s no reason why the WHO can’t see a similar transformation with the right leadership and reprioritization of goals.</p><p>President Trump’s insistence that the WHO cleans up its act should 
result in a capable agency that protects public health instead of 
coddling strongmen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.024049997329712-->