<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Trading halted for Victoria’s Secret owner L Brands as stocks drop 20 percent]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/04/22/trading-halted-for-victorias-secret-owner-l-brands-as-stocks-drop-20-percent/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/04/22/trading-halted-for-victorias-secret-owner-l-brands-as-stocks-drop-20-percent/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/04/trading-halted-for-victorias-secret-owner-l-brands-as-stocks-drop-20-percent-scaled.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Trading halted for Victoria’s Secret owner L Brands as stocks drop 20 percent</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trading was halted in Victoria’s Secret parent company on Wednesday after the stock dropped more than 20 percent on news that a deal to sell 55 percent of the lingerie peddler could collapse.</p><p>The New York Stock Exchange at 11:13 am said it was halting trading in L Brands, which also owns Bed Bath &amp; Beyond, after the stock fell 20.6 percent to $9.57 a share.</p><p>On Wednesday, private equity firm Sycamore Partners filed a lawsuit in Delaware seeking to back out of its offer to buy a 55 percent stake in L Brands’ lingerie business, according to the Wall Street Journal. Sycamore had agreed to fork over $525 million for the controlling stake weeks before the coronavirus shuttered large segments of the economy, including retail.</p><p>The deal had been slated to close this quarter.</p><p>Sycamore’s lawsuit accused L Brands of being in violation of their purchase agreement, citing the company’s store closures, its failure to pay rent  and the furloughing of  a majority of its workforce, The Journal reported.</p><p>The firm is seeking the court’s blessing to wiggle out of the deal.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.0086119174957275-->