<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA['This is moving to the Supreme Court': Trump campaign blasts 'Obama-appointed judge' who wrote Pennsylvania court ruling]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/11/22/this-is-moving-to-the-supreme-court-trump-campaign-blasts-obama-appointed-judge-who-wrote-pennsylvania-court-ruling/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/11/22/this-is-moving-to-the-supreme-court-trump-campaign-blasts-obama-appointed-judge-who-wrote-pennsylvania-court-ruling/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/11/22/this-is-moving-to-the-supreme-court-trump-campaign-blasts-obama-appointed-judge-who-wrote-pennsylvania-court-ruling.png" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">'This is moving to the Supreme Court': Trump campaign blasts 'Obama-appointed judge' who wrote Pennsylvania court ruling</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="mol-para-with-font">The two lawyers leading the Trump campaign&rsquo;s legal efforts to contest the election results, Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, released a statement in response to the ruling saying that they intend to appeal to the nation&rsquo;s highest court.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;Today&rsquo;s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the US Supreme Court,&rsquo; the statement read.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we&rsquo;re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.&rsquo;</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">The statement continued: &lsquo;We will be seeking an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;There is so much evidence that in Pennsylvania, Democrats eliminated our opportunity to present 50 witnesses and other evidence that election officials blatantly ignored Pennsylvania&rsquo;s law denying independent review.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;This resulted in 682,777 ballots being cast illegally, wittingly or unwittingly.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;This is just an extension of the Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;We are disappointed we did not at least get the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing. Unfortunately the censorship continues.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;We hope that the Third Circuit will be as gracious as Judge Brann in deciding our appeal one way or the other as expeditiously as possible.</p>
<p class="mol-para-with-font">&lsquo;This is another case that appears to be moving quickly to the United States Supreme Court.&rsquo;&nbsp;</p>
<p><img id="i-85e2a74f07a019c8" class="blkBorder img-share b-loaded" style="max-width: 100%; display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"  data-src="/uploads/2020/11/22/35959030-8973941-image-a-91_1606012640785.jpg" alt="" width="588" height="469" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.046844005584717-->