<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[The Terrible Policy Biden and Trump Agree On]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/12/16/the-terrible-policy-biden-and-trump-agree-on/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/12/16/the-terrible-policy-biden-and-trump-agree-on/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/12/16/the-terrible-policy-biden-and-trump-agree-on.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">The Terrible Policy Biden and Trump Agree On</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Joe Biden and Donald Trump were two very different presidential candidates, but they agreed on at least one key point. Too bad it&rsquo;s one they&rsquo;re both wrong about: The importance of &ldquo;Buying American.&rdquo;&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The catchphrase sounds nice, but behind the rousingly patriotic rhetoric is a seriously misguided economic philosophy that hurts American individuals and businesses.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When politicians say they support &ldquo;Buying American,&rdquo; they&rsquo;re broadly referring to policies that mandate domestic content requirements for government purchases. This necessarily excludes other countries even if they offer better or cheaper materials. (Aka a better deal for taxpayers). </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Now that Biden is <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/14/election-results-biden-electoral-votes.html">set to be the next president</a>, it&rsquo;s time to look seriously at these policies. And despite touting a more open and global viewpoint during the campaign that contrasted with Trump&rsquo;s nationalist disposition, much of Biden&rsquo;s approach to trade will likely resemble the current president&rsquo;s </span><a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/05/protectionism-trump-biden-buy-american-tariffs/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">protectionism by another name</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Earlier in the year, Biden </span><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/09/joe-biden-buy-american-proposal-economic-platform"><span style="font-weight: 400;">announced</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> his $700 billion </span><a href="https://joebiden.com/made-in-america/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">plan</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to revive US industry, involving six &ldquo;lines of effort&rdquo; dedicated to remaking American manufacturing and investing. Most of the promises are vague, like his promise to &ldquo;bring back critical supply chains to America&rdquo; and &ldquo;pursue a pro-American worker tax and trade strategy.&rdquo; Others, however, are a little more direct, like Biden&rsquo;s promise to spend $400 billion on procurement investment on American products, materials, and services.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These plans make for good politics, if not policy, because the idea of Buying American is popular. A</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">recent </span><a href="https://tradevistas.org/buy-american-poll-public-opinion/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">poll</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> by TradeVistas, where I work, showed overwhelming support for the sentiment among all political leanings. About 75 percent of Americans support a policy mandating that the federal government use domestic suppliers when possible.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And the idea isn&rsquo;t new. Buy-American-type legislation was enacted throughout the 20th century, with Herbert Hoover </span><a href="https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/buy-american-bad-taxpayers-and-worse-exports"><span style="font-weight: 400;">introducing</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> the first true piece of Buy American law in the midst of the Great Depression and with subsequent presidents adding to it in the </span><a href="https://tradevistas.org/buy-american-policies-history/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">1980s, 1990s and 2000s.&nbsp;</span></a></p>
<div style="clear: both;">&nbsp;</div>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, it is Trump who fully embraced the idea, making extensive use of </span><a href="https://tradevistas.org/buy-american-policies-history/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">executive orders</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to establish and push a Buy American agenda. These have included his &ldquo;Buy American Hire American&rdquo; </span><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-buy-american-hire-american/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">executive order</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> of 2017, and most recently, his 2020 </span><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-ensuring-essential-medicines-medical-countermeasures-critical-inputs-made-united-states/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">order</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> on &ldquo;Ensuring Essential Medicines, Medical Countermeasures, and Critical Inputs Are Made in the United States&rdquo; in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</span></p>
<p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">&ldquo;So what?&rdquo;</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> you might ask. </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">&ldquo;What&rsquo;s wrong with buying American?&rdquo;&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nothing, if it&rsquo;s part of a free and competitive market system. But </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">mandated</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Buy American policies impose burdensome costs on businesses, increase costs to taxpayers, and damage trade relationships with our foreign allies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">First, the imposition of Buy American greatly complicates the procurement process. As most supply chains are long and complex, relying on the highly specialized knowledge of thousands of individuals across the world, altering them to meet the domestic requirements is a </span><a href="https://www.heritage.org/trade/report/buy-american-laws-costly-policy-mistake-hurts-americans"><span style="font-weight: 400;">burdensome, costly and inefficient task</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Secondly, mandating that everything governments purchase must be made domestically greatly reduces the pool of potential suppliers from which to purchase. This decreases competition&mdash;and increases prices. Since taxpayers are the ones footing the bill for these projects, it is Americans who end up paying more for these projects.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Finally, amid a fraught international political climate and following a Trump presidency that </span><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/10/donald-trump-foreign-policy/616773/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">damaged the US&rsquo;s global reputation</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, now is the time to embrace trade relationships and the benefit they can bring, not exclude them. Biden&rsquo;s rhetoric already has even the US&rsquo;s closest allies worried and planning for what this aspect of his presidency might mean for them. Canada, which has benefitted from agreements allowing them to </span><a href="https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/other-autre/us-eu.aspx?lang=eng"><span style="font-weight: 400;">participate</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in US procurement contracts in the past, has raised concerns over the president-elect&rsquo;s Buy American policies and </span><a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/buy-american-details-biden-1.5808216"><span style="font-weight: 400;">awaits further clarification</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> on whether past free trade agreements will be honored.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For a president-elect hoping to bring the world together, this Buy American push will do little to mend shaky international relationships. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">So, the president-elect should rethink his position and leave economic nationalism behind as a relic of Trump&rsquo;s tenure. If he really wants to re-establish the US on the international stage and help Americans, Biden should buy from whoever makes it best.</span></p>
<p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">By </span><strong>Alice Calder </strong></em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.022567987442017-->