<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[The Sources of Chinese Conduct: A Debate]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/12/29/the-sources-of-chinese-conduct-a-debate/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/12/29/the-sources-of-chinese-conduct-a-debate/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/12/29/the-sources-of-chinese-conduct-a-debate.png" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">The Sources of Chinese Conduct: A Debate</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a half-century ago, George Kennan published an analysis of the sources of Soviet conduct that helped to shape US policy toward Moscow throughout the Cold War. &nbsp;More recently, the State Department&rsquo;s Policy Planning Staff &ndash; an organization that Kennan founded and led &ndash; published an analysis of 21st-century Chinese conduct meant to provide the underpinnings for a new American approach to contending with Beijing&rsquo;s growing might.&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />Did Kennan&rsquo;s successors hit the mark on China? What is the nature of our competition with China? And what should we be aiming for?</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KyBVmSaua5I" frameborder="0" width="600" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p>To discuss these vital topics, the Center for the National Interest hosted a panel of the following top experts:</p>
<div class="ad ad--center">
<div class="proper-ad-unit">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<p><strong>Peter Berkowitz</strong>, Director of the State Department&rsquo;s Policy Planning Staff, will present the case for its paper,&nbsp;<a href="https://cftni.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=5689b587af9ebf3140b642e9d&amp;id=1badae7ac2&amp;e=23772129cc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-auth="NotApplicable">&ldquo;The Elements of the China Challenge.&rdquo;</a>&nbsp; Dr. Berkowitz joined the State Department from the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, where he is the Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow.&nbsp; He is the author of hundreds of books, articles, essays, and reviews on political thought, constitutional law, national security, and international politics.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Elbridge Colby</strong>, co-founder and principal at The Marathon Initiative and former Pentagon lead for the development of the 2018 National Defense Strategy, recently co-authored&nbsp;<a href="https://cftni.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=5689b587af9ebf3140b642e9d&amp;id=054c454354&amp;e=23772129cc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-auth="NotApplicable">an article</a> in Foreign Affairs contending that the competition with China is not fundamentally about ideology &ndash; and that overestimating ideology&rsquo;s role is dangerous for the United States.</p>
<p><em><strong>Jacob Heilbrunn</strong>, editor of The National Interest, moderated the discussion.</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.024174928665161-->