<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Set phasers to stunned: ‘Star Trek’ film reboot on hold, but could still happen]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/08/07/set-phasers-to-stunned-star-trek-film-reboot-on-hold-but-could-still-happen/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/08/07/set-phasers-to-stunned-star-trek-film-reboot-on-hold-but-could-still-happen/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 21:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/08/set-phasers-to-stunned-star-trek-film-reboot-on-hold-but-could-still-happen.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Set phasers to stunned: ‘Star Trek’ film reboot on hold, but could still happen</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EXCLUSIVE</strong>: Looks like Paramount’s plan to next make the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; movie that Noah Hawley wrote and plans to direct has been put on pause for a moment. New film chief Emma Watts, who managed many a franchise at Fox, is in the process of figuring out which way to go.</p><p>The pause on the Hawley project, which had been in soft prep, prompted rumors this week that the filmmaker might exit, but that has not happened yet, sources said. <strong>Deadline revealed in 2019</strong> that Hawley made a deal on &#8220;Trek&#8221; — the &#8220;Fargo&#8221; and &#8220;Legion&#8221; EP was driven by his love for the original series, just like JJ Abrams when he directed the first installment. The other two possibilities are the one that <strong>&#8220;The Revenant&#8221;’s Mark L. Smith</strong> wrote for Quentin Tarantino to direct (<strong>Deadline broke that one late 2017</strong>), and another that was going to bring back the original cast — at one time with talk that Chris Hemsworth would return and play Chris Pine’s father in a time travel narrative. S. J. Clarkson was attached to direct but exited for &#8220;Game of Thrones.&#8221;</p><p>What we’re hearing is that both the Hawley pic — which calls for a new cast and might be about a deadly virus which might feel awkward given current circumstance — and the Smith version — Tarantino dropped out as director, but the project is still viable based on an episode of the classic &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; series that takes place largely earthbound in a 30s gangster setting — might serve the franchise best as &#8220;Logan&#8221;-like spinoffs when the core franchise has been revitalized. But that the other one might have the cleanest path toward a relaunch, with an emphasis on boosting overseas gross numbers which have never been the franchise’s strong suit. These decisions will take place over the next few weeks.</p><p>&#8220;Star Trek&#8221; continues to be a monster franchise for ViacomCBS, so they want to make sure they get it right. One reason the Hemsworth-Pine version stalled is the high price of keeping the original cast in place. Between &#8220;Fargo&#8221; and a book he is completing, Hawley (who made his directing debut on the arthouse pic &#8220;Lucy in the Sky&#8221;) has plenty to keep him occupied. Stay tuned.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.037594079971313-->