<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Rams want a ‘Tom Brady Rule’ after being burned on one play]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2021/04/02/rams-want-a-tom-brady-rule-after-being-burned-on-one-play/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2021/04/02/rams-want-a-tom-brady-rule-after-being-burned-on-one-play/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2021/04/02/rams-want-a-tom-brady-rule-after-being-burned-on-one-play.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Rams want a ‘Tom Brady Rule’ after being burned on one play</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[
						

		
			
		


<p>Let’s call it “The Tom Brady Rule.”</p>



<p>Among the many possible NFL rules changes submitted by teams this offseason, ranging from the absurd to the minutia-focused, is an example from the Rams that reveals just how difficult it is to defend Brady, <strong>according to CBS Sports. </strong></p>



<p>Brady completed two forward passes on the same play in a Buccaneers-Rams regular season game. After his first attempt was batted backwards into his own hands, Brady then re-threw the ball and completed an eight-yard completion to Mike Evans.</p>



<p>Throwing two forward passes on the same play already is illegal and penalized by a five-yard penalty. But the Rams, who won that Week 11 game 27-24, found this to be a conundrum with no good options when asked to accept or decline.</p>



<p>Because Brady completed the second pass attempt, the Rams were left to choose between declining the penalty (giving the Buccaneers a manageable fourth-and-2 instead of fourth-and-10) or accepting the penalty (giving the Buccaneers another opportunity at third-and-15 instead of third-and-10).</p>



<p>In other words, their good defense on the play wasn’t fully rewarded.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img  data-src="/uploads/2021/04/02/rams-want-a-tom-brady-rule-after-being-burned-on-one-play-0.jpg" /><figcaption>Tom Brady playing against the Rams on Nov. 23, 2020</figcaption><figcaption><span class="credit">AP</span></figcaption></figure>



<p>So, the Rams’ rule change suggests that in this instance the penalty be five yards AND a loss of down, so the Buccaneers would’ve faced fourth-and-15. It&#8217;s a very logical rule change that should not find too much resistance.</p>



<p>It’s a rare instance when two forward passes are attempted on the same play. It usually means one was batted back to the quarterback.</p>



<p>But then-Titans quarterback Marcus Mariota actually threw a touchdown pass to himself in a playoff game against the Chiefs in January 2018. He caught his own first pass and then ran for the end zone, rather than trying to throw the ball a second time.&nbsp;</p>
			 
					
						<p>This story originally appeared on: <strong>NyPost</strong> - Author:<strong>Ryan Dunleavy</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Dunleavy]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.095748901367188-->