<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Packers respond to friction talk after failed Will Fuller trade]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/11/04/packers-respond-to-friction-talk-after-failed-will-fuller-trade/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/11/04/packers-respond-to-friction-talk-after-failed-will-fuller-trade/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/11/04/matt-lafleur-will-fuller-texans-packers-trade-deadline-nfl.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Packers respond to friction talk after failed Will Fuller trade</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[
						<p>The Packers are refuting reports of internal friction over the team&#8217;s failed Will Fuller pursuit.</p>
<p>ESPN&#8217;s Dianna Russini <strong>reported</strong> that the team was in disagreement within &#8220;the highest levels of the organization&#8221; <strong>over negotiations for the Texans&#8217; receiver</strong> — a claim Packers head coach Matt LaFleur denies.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have no idea where anything like that would ever come from,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We&#8217;re (LaFleur and general manager Brian Gutekunst) in constant communication, we&#8217;re on the same page and there is no truth to that. I promise you that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Multiple reports said that the Packers (5-2) had offered the Texans (1-6) a fourth-round pick, but Houston wanted at least a second-rounder and the opportunity passed with Tuesday&#8217;s 4 p.m. NFL trade deadline.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t know if anything ever got that serious,&#8221; LaFleur said of the negotiations.</p>
<p>Fuller, 26, has caught 31 of 47 targets for 490 yards and five touchdowns this year as the Texans&#8217; No. 1 option with DeAndre Hopkins dealt to the Cardinals. The 2016 first-rounder from Notre Dame would have added much-needed depth at receiver; a shallow position for the Packers which they <strong>did not address during the 2020 NFL Draft</strong>. Allen Lazard, who has been on injured reserve since Week 4 after undergoing core muscle surgery, still boasts the team&#8217;s second-best receiving stats behind Davante Adams.</p>
<p>&#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t say we necessarily need to, because I think we&#8217;ve shown what we can do,&#8221; Adams said on Tuesday of adding a receiver, via ESPN. &#8220;When I went down, guys stepped up and did what they had to do. Stepped up big. I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s a need. Obviously, I&#8217;ve said this before, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s any secret that could help us potentially. I wouldn&#8217;t be opposed to it. It could help us. But I definitely got full faith and trust in my guys here to be able to get it done.&#8221;</p>
<figure id="attachment_16565831"  class="wp-caption aligncenter"><strong><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/11/04/matt-lafleur-will-fuller-texans-packers-trade-deadline-nfl.jpg" /></strong><figcaption class="wp-caption-text"><span>Green Bay Packers head coach Matt LaFleur and Houston Texans wide receiver Will Fuller V</span><span class="credit">Getty Images</span></figcaption></figure>
<p>“I’m not going to get into those conversations,” quarterback Aaron Rodgers said. “Again, I’m just going to reiterate what I said and continue to say, that I clearly understand my role and my place on this team, and that’s my focus.”</p>
<p>Lazard is designated to return from IR as soon as this week, so it is possible that the Packers felt confident and didn&#8217;t feel the need to overextend themselves for another receiver.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think he&#8217;s really close,&#8221; LaFleur said. &#8220;I think he&#8217;s done everything that we&#8217;ve asked him to do, and the trainers have asked him to do, and it&#8217;s just a matter of when we feel like it&#8217;s safe for him to go out there, and then he&#8217;ll be out there. I know he wants to be out there in the worst way, and he wishes he was out there yesterday. But we&#8217;re going to take our time and be smart with him and make sure that he&#8217;s able to go out there and play to the level that he&#8217;s been able to do for the last year and a half.&#8221;</p>
<p>While Lazard may return for the Packers&#8217; Week 9 Thursday night showdown against the 49ers (4-4), they will be without running backs Jamaal Williams, A.J. Dillon and possibly Aaron Jones, who is still recovering from a calf injury. Dillon tested positive for COVID-19 and was in close contact with Williams, who has also been placed on the COVID-19/reserve list.</p>
			
					
						]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.0083210468292236-->