<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Meghan Markle to pay $90K in legal fees over court battle with Daily Mail]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/07/30/meghan-markle-to-pay-90k-in-legal-fees-over-court-battle-with-daily-mail/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/07/30/meghan-markle-to-pay-90k-in-legal-fees-over-court-battle-with-daily-mail/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/07/meghan-people.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Meghan Markle to pay $90K in legal fees over court battle with Daily Mail</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Meghan Markle</strong> has agreed to pay almost $90,000 in legal fees after <strong>losing the first leg</strong> of her court battle against a British tabloid, according to court documents.</p><p>The Duchess of Sussex is in the midst of an ongoing legal battle with the Daily Mail&#8217;s publishers over a series of articles using a handwritten letter she sent her dad, Thomas, over his <strong>no-show at her royal wedding</strong>.</p><p>She lost an early ruling in May when the judge ordered her to throw out sections accusing the paper of &#8220;deliberately stirring up&#8221; and <strong>causing the rift</strong> &#8212; and last Wednesday agreed to pay the publisher&#8217;s costs for the hearing.</p><p>Court filings show she will pay the UK equivalent of $88,500.</p><p>News of the payout comes as Markle, 38, still waits for a verdict in the latest round as she battles to <strong>keep secret the names of five friends</strong> who spoke to People magazine in defense of her amid the public battle with her dad.</p><p>The Mail&#8217;s lawyers claim the five – referred to in court as A to E – should be identified, arguing that their interview brought into the public arena the letter with her father that the paper then published.</p><p>However, Markle&#8217;s lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke, said in a written submission to London&#8217;s High Court Wednesday that being forced to name her friends would be &#8220;an unacceptably high price&#8221; for the duchess.</p><p> <noscript><img data- data-src="/uploads/2020/07/meghan-people.jpg" class="lazyload" src="" /><noscript><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/07/meghan-people.jpg" /></noscript></noscript><img class="lazyload" src='data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=%22http://www.w3.org/2000/svg%22%20viewBox=%220%200%20210%20140%22%3E%3C/svg%3E' data- data-src="/uploads/2020/07/meghan-people.jpg" /></p><p> People Magazine cover on&#8221; The truth about Meghan&#8221; from Feb. 18, 2019.</p><p> <noscript><img data- data-src="/uploads/2020/07/MEGA333723_002.jpg" class="lazyload" src="" /><noscript><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/07/MEGA333723_002.jpg" /></noscript></noscript><img class="lazyload" src='" /><noscript><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/07/MEGA638989_035.jpg" /></noscript></noscript><img class="lazyload" src='data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=%22http://www.w3.org/2000/svg%22%20viewBox=%220%200%20210%20140%22%3E%3C/svg%3E' data- data-src="/uploads/2020/07/MEGA638989_035.jpg" /></p><p> Prince Harry and Meghan Markle</p><p class="credit">MEGA</p><p>“These were confidential sources who gave the interviews on condition of anonymity,&#8221; Rushbrooke said.</p><p>The judge said he will make a ruling in writing at a later date.</p><p>Markle is seeking damages for alleged misuse of private information, copyright infringement and breach of the Data Protection Act over five articles, two<strong> in the Mail on Sunday</strong> and three on DailyMail.com.</p><p>The publisher, Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), denies the allegations.</p><p><em>With Post wires</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.096099853515625-->