<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Here’s everything we know so far about the second COVID-19 stimulus check]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/08/13/heres-everything-we-know-so-far-about-the-second-covid-19-stimulus-check/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/08/13/heres-everything-we-know-so-far-about-the-second-covid-19-stimulus-check/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/08/scumer-pelosi.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Here’s everything we know so far about the second COVID-19 stimulus check</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It been more than four months since Uncle Sam doled out $1,200 stimulus checks to help Americans cope with the <strong>crippling effects of COVID-19</strong> on the US economy. With cases continuing to surge across the country and millions of Americans still out of work, lawmakers are in discussions for a second round of checks.</p><p>But there&#8217;s still a lot of bickering on Capitol Hill over competing proposals that have been put forth by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.</p><p>Here&#8217;s everything we know so far about the potential for another round of checks:</p><h2><strong>Democrats and Republicans agree the checks are necessary</strong></h2><p>Leaders from both parties agree that Americans are hurting and in need of financial assistance. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell last month introduced the <strong>HEALS Act</strong>, which would put another $1,200 check in the pockets of most American adults.</p><p>Democrats have similarly proposed another round of $1,200 payments with the <strong>HEROES Act</strong>, which was passed by the House in May.</p><h2><strong>But the similarities stop there</strong></h2><p>Partisan gridlock over the overall cost of any stimulus bill has caused negotiations to drag on for weeks, with a clear gulf between what both sides want.</p><p>The Democratic leaders publicly offered on Friday to negotiate an approximately $2 trillion deal after initially insisting that Republicans cave and pass a $3.4 trillion package. Senate Republicans unveiled a proposal for about $1 trillion in stimulus spending.</p><p>Talks <strong>appeared to deteriorate</strong> on Wednesday with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer accusing each other of refusing to budge, just two days after Mnuchin <strong>told CNBC</strong> the Trump administration was willing to produce an aid package this week “if we can get a fair deal.”</p><p>“Democrats have compromised,” Pelosi and Schumer said Wednesday. “Repeatedly, we have made clear to the Administration that we are willing to come down $1 trillion if they will come up $1 trillion. However, it is clear that the Administration still does not grasp the magnitude of the problems that American families are facing.”</p><p>Mnuchin, meanwhile, said that Pelosi &#8220;was unwilling to continue negotiations unless we agreed in advance to her proposal, costing at least $2 trillion.&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;The Democrats have no interest in negotiating,&#8221; he added.</p><h4>see also</h4><article class="story-photo-box  oversize-headline"><p> <strong><br /> <noscript><img data- data-src="/uploads/2020/08/scumer-pelosi.jpg" class="lazyload" src="" /><noscript><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/08/scumer-pelosi.jpg" /></noscript></noscript><img class="lazyload" src='data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=%22http://www.w3.org/2000/svg%22%20viewBox=%220%200%20210%20140%22%3E%3C/svg%3E' data- data-src="/uploads/2020/08/scumer-pelosi.jpg" /></p><p> </strong></p><p> <strong></p><ul class="flag-wrapper"></ul><p> <strong></p><h3 class="postid-16128625 headline"> Here&#039;s when you might see another stimulus check</h3><p> </strong></p><p> </strong></p><p> The IRS could send out most of the proposed $1,200&#8230;<br /></article><h2><strong>Their proposals have stark differences</strong></h2><p>Central points of disagreement in stimulus legislation talks include a Democratic request for $1 trillion in state and local aid, which Republicans oppose. Democrats object to a proposed Republican liability waiver for businesses and want to resurrect the $600 weekly unemployment that expired last month, which Republicans said could encourage people to not return to work.</p><p>Democrats also want non-citizens with IRS-issued taxpayer numbers to be eligible for stimulus checks, a proposal that has been a non-starter with Republicans.</p><h2><strong>Even Trump&#8217;s name is a sticking point&nbsp;</strong></h2><p>The first round of checks that went out earlier this year prominently <strong>featured the president&#8217;s name</strong> printed on them — a change that delayed the production of the checks by several days— something that Democrats scrapped in their most recent proposal. Republicans, however, have not shown any inclination to scrub Trump&#8217;s name from the checks.</p><h2 id="cx-article-inline-newsletter-tile"><strong>They could arrive as soon as this month — if Congress gets its act together</strong></h2><p>The Internal Revenue Service could send out most of the proposed $1,200 payments by the end of August if lawmakers reach a deal to send them out this week, IRS staffer Chad Hooper <strong>told CNBC</strong> in a Tuesday report.</p><p>That’s because the tax agency is “better positioned” to distribute the cash than it was in April, when taxpayers <strong>encountered glitches</strong> in receiving the payments meant to blunt the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic, according to Hooper.</p><p>“The infrastructure is already in place to administer such a payment,” Hooper said.</p><h2><strong>But Congress just kicked off its August recess</strong></h2><p>Many members of Congress left Washington for their home states this week, with lawmakers on recess <strong>until Sept. 7</strong>. The lawmakers can be called back to DC to vote if a deal is reached, however.</p><h2><strong>Meanwhile, President Trump is extending unemployment benefits via executive order</strong></h2><p><strong>Trump on Saturday</strong> signed executive orders to extend the weekly unemployment benefits created under the CARES act, but reducing it to $400 from $600.</p><p>White House economic adviser <a href="https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/1292472481958289417?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Peter Navarro</a> said the president had to take action to protect Americans after negotiations in Congress ground to a standstill. But it&#8217;s still unclear whether the checks will make it to Americans because it requires state governors to set up a program to provide the benefit and calls for $100 of the weekly payments to be picked up by cash-strapped states</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.009584903717041-->