<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Gun Rights Orgs File Federal Lawsuit Against LA Sheriff Villanueva Over Gun Store Closures]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/03/29/gun-rights-orgs-file-federal-lawsuit-against-la-sheriff-villanueva-over-gun-store-closures/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/03/29/gun-rights-orgs-file-federal-lawsuit-against-la-sheriff-villanueva-over-gun-store-closures/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/03/Gun-Constitution.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Gun Rights Orgs File Federal Lawsuit Against LA Sheriff Villanueva Over Gun Store Closures</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of a week of flip-flopping by Los Angeles County Sheriff 
Alex Villanueva on the issue of whether gun stores are “essential” 
businesses or not during a public health emergency (the anti-2A 
authoritarian eventually <a href="https://www.redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2020/03/26/la-county-sheriff-again-deems-gun-stores-nonessential-orders-them-closed/">decided they were not</a>),
 four gun rights organizations have filed a federal lawsuit against 
Villanueva, California Gov Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles County.</p><p>The
 suit, filed by Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), National Rifle 
Association of America (NRA), California Gun Rights Foundation (CGF), 
and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and individual and retail 
plaintiffs, alleges that Newsom and Villanueva’s orders are 
“unconstitutionally vague, arbitrary and capricious, and violate the 
Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights of Plaintiffs and similarly 
situated Californians.”</p><p>In the <a href="https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5562/attachments/original/1585333514/2020-3-27-ca-brandy-complaint.pdf?1585333514">Complaint</a> Plaintiffs acknowledge the unique circumstances facing state and local 
officials but maintain that such circumstances aren’t an excuse for 
officials to turn their political opinions into public policy:</p><blockquote class="wp-block-quote"><p>Subjective
 political opinions are irrelevant to this truth: State and federal 
firearms licensees are essential businesses that provide access to 
constitutionally protected rights. Full stop. Californians cannot 
exercise their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms without such
 businesses.</p><p>The circumstances posed by the Novel Coronavirus 
(“COVID-19”) outbreak are noteworthy, but do not excuse unlawful 
government infringements upon freedom. In fact, the importance of 
maintaining the ongoing activities of essential businesses for the 
safety, health, and welfare of Californians makes Plaintiffs’ point: the
 need for enhanced safety during uncertain times is precisely when 
Plaintiffs and their members must be able to exercise their fundamental 
rights to keep and bear arms.</p></blockquote><p>In a <a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/fpc-saf-cgf-nra-file-federal-lawsuit-against-los-angeles-sheriff-villanueva-california-gov-gavin-newsom-over-constitutional-violations">press release</a> CGF Chairman Gene Hoffman referred to the <a href="https://www.npr.org/2017/04/26/524744989/when-la-erupted-in-anger-a-look-back-at-the-rodney-king-riots">riots that took place in Los Angeles</a> after a jury acquitted four police officers accused of beating Rodney 
King as an example of why individuals have to rely on themselves as 
their own first responders in a time of crisis:</p><blockquote class="wp-block-quote"><p>“Twenty-eight
 years ago, the LAPD had to withdraw their officers to protect their 
safety. We hope that the stay-home orders will mean that our public 
servants will not become infected in this pandemic, but the Constitution
 guarantees that everyone has a right to acquire arms and defend 
themselves should law enforcement not be able to respond before it’s too
 late….No petty autocrat can be allowed to suspend the Bill of Rights.”</p></blockquote><p>Plaintiffs  are asking for a “preliminary and permanent injunction” prohibiting  enforcement of the order, and for a declaratory judgment that  Defendants’ orders, “policies, practices, and customs…individually  and/or collectively violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.”</p><p> The groups encourage individual arms applicants/purchasers and retailers  affected by ‘stay-home’ or shutdown orders to report potential civil  rights violations to Firearms Policy Coalition’s COVID-19 Issue Hotline  at<a href="http://www.fpchotline.org/"> www.FPChotline.org</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.1181058883667-->