<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Giants have to start making some noise in NFL free agency]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2021/03/16/giants-have-to-start-making-some-noise-in-nfl-free-agency/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2021/03/16/giants-have-to-start-making-some-noise-in-nfl-free-agency/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2021/03/16/giants-have-to-start-making-some-noise-in-nfl-free-agency.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Giants have to start making some noise in NFL free agency</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[
						

	
		
	


<p>It is not as if the Giants had to re-sign Dalvin Tomlinson, <strong>although it would have been nice</strong>.</p>



<p>It is not as if the Giants had to land a starting wide receiver on the first day of the NFL free agency legal tampering period, <strong>but it would have been appreciated</strong>.</p>



<p>It is not if the Giants on Day 1 had to come to contract terms with Bud Dupree or Leonard Floyd or Trey Hendrickson, but it surely would have helped their pass-rush.</p>



<p>The first day was more about what the Giants did not do, because re-signing Austin Johnson and <strong>getting running back Devontae Booker</strong> secured are not moves to assuage anyone’s fears that the Giants’ salary-cap restraints will lead to an uninspiring haul.&nbsp;Johnson was a backup with the Giants in 2020 and Booker has been an NFL backup for five years, turns 29 in May and is expected to once again be a backup, with Saquon Barkley&#8217;s return from injury. </p>



<p>The Giants certainly did not “win&#8221; opening day.&nbsp;That does not matter much or at all, as long as the Giants do something, soon, to make their roster look better and convince the paying customers that they have a plan, other than “we’ll do what we can.&#8221;</p>


		<iframe
			title="Podcast"
			width="100%"
			height="188px"
			src="https://embed.acast.com/blue-rush/examiningthegiantsfreeagencyplans?accentColor=2a2a2a&#038;bgColor=f6f6f6&#038;font-family=proxima%20nova&#038;logo=false&#038;secondaryColor=cc3333"
			scrolling="no"
			frameBorder="0"
			>
		</iframe>
		


<p>Everyone knew this <strong>was not going to be a free-agency feeding frenzy</strong> for the Giants, not with limited cap space &#8212; about $4 million heading into the first day of negotiating &#8212; and considering the Joe Judge team-building philosophy is more about developing his own young players acquired in the draft or with under-the-radar signings.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Everyone also knows cap space can be created &#8212; often without compromising the hit down the road &#8212; and that the Giants need more than a few minor upgrades to their roster.&nbsp;Everyone also knows it is imperative for the Giants to gain cap room with <strong>a Nate Solder salary slash </strong>and reduce Leonard Williams franchise tag cap hit of $19.4 million by signing him to a long-term deal.&nbsp;This is the goal and was the goal for quite a while, and if the Giants cannot do it, they either read Williams wrong or read the market for top-tier defensive tackles wrong or else Williams is holding them hostage for far more than $20 million per year.&nbsp;Either way, this is a deal that must get done, or else the Giants and general manager Dave Gettleman look bad and the ramifications on the cap are debilitating.</p>



<p>It does not take long for the “What the hell are they doing?&#8221; crowd to pivot to “Now I get it, good move&#8221; sentiments.&nbsp;Watch what happens if the Giants sign one of the remaining stud receivers, Kenny Golladay or JuJu Smith-Schuster, or pass rusher Haason Reddick.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img  data-src="/uploads/2021/03/16/giants-have-to-start-making-some-noise-in-nfl-free-agency-0.jpg" /><figcaption>Juju Smith-Schuster, Haason Reddick, Kenny Golladay</figcaption><figcaption><span class="credit">Getty Images (3)</span></figcaption></figure>



<p>Not every plan will assuage the fans but there needs to be a plan that is coherent and makes sense.&nbsp;The Giants knew they had to release steady guard Kevin Zeitler to remove his $14.5 million cap hit and gain $12 million in cap savings. That was subtraction. If the plan moving forward is for a total youth movement on the offensive line, with Shane Lemieux and possibly benched Will Hernandez as the starting guards, that is more hope and prayer than a plan.</p>


<p>The Giants love Tomlinson, but not enough to deem him irreplaceable, which is fine, considering their 2017 second-round pick is an excellent run-stuffer and an even better team guy, but not a difference-maker.&nbsp;As long as Williams is secured on a long-term deal and he is paired with Dexter Lawrence up front, the Giants should be fine on their defensive line.&nbsp;But this does not mean they can throw anyone in there at nose tackle.&nbsp; The front office knew Tomlinson would command at least $10 million a year and that is pretty much how it went down, with Tomlinson landing with the Vikings on a two-year deal worth $22 million. The money was not there for Williams and Tomlinson.&nbsp;But the money must be there to fortify other areas, right?</p>



<p>This is one phase.&nbsp;The NFL Draft is the second phase.&nbsp;If the Giants go into the draft &#8212; remember, they only have six picks this year &#8212; with the same glaring needs as they had entering free agency, it will be mission impossible.&nbsp;They do not have to be incredibly bold in the coming days but they cannot be willfully bland, or else the losing cycle will not be broken.</p>
			 
					
						<p>This story originally appeared on: <strong>NyPost</strong> - Author:<strong>Paul Schwartz</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.074918031692505-->