<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Free Trade Empowers Women and Tariffs Hurt Them]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/04/27/free-trade-empowers-women-and-tariffs-hurt-them/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/04/27/free-trade-empowers-women-and-tariffs-hurt-them/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:26:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/04/960x0.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Free Trade Empowers Women and Tariffs Hurt Them</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an underappreciated fact that women are hit particularly hard by the United States’ <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tariffs-what-is-a-tariff-meaning-for-prices-consumer-2018-3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ever-increasing tariffs on imports</a> and burgeoning trade war with China (and, possibly, other countries as well).</p><p>Recently another set of tariffs on imports took effect, raising 
prices on hundreds of goods especially important to women, including 
foodstuffs and appliances. It may sound trite—or worse—to associate 
these goods primarily with women. But economic history clearly shows 
that labor-saving appliances and ready-made food products save women 
time, thereby expanding their opportunities, and allowing them to 
improve their education and skills, pursue employment outside the home, 
and do other things they value.</p><p>Consider just one appliance that the administration’s tariffs have hit especially hard: the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/business/trump-tariffs-washing-machines-solar-panels.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">washing machine</a>.
 Just a century ago, women would spend at least one full day of their 
already overburdened week soaking, stirring, boiling, wringing, hanging,
 deodorizing, starching and then folding and ironing their household 
laundry.</p><p><br> Today, the washing machine reduces the amount of weekly active work on 
laundry to around an hour. As University of Cambridge economist Ha-Joon 
Chang has <a href="http://humanprogress.org/article.php?p=584" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">noted</a>,
 “Without the washing machine, the scale of change in the role of women 
in society and in family dynamics would not have been nearly as 
dramatic.” Yet the U.S. recently placed a 25 percent tariff on Samsung 
and LG washing machines from South Korea, and has tariffed the foreign 
steel and aluminum used in American-made washers. As a result, the price
 of these machines has already <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-tariffs-are-already-backfiring/2018/06/14/896b6c5a-700d-11e8-afd5-778aca903bbe_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">increased</a> 17 percent.</p><p><br> The new tariffs will increase the cost of countless goods that have 
freed women’s time and dramatically improved gender equality, helping 
make two-earner households possible. Consumers will see heftier 
price-tags on vacuum cleaners, sewing machines, refrigerators, 
dishwashers, kitchen waste disposers, blenders, food processors, toaster
 ovens, microwaves, kitchen ranges and ovens, slow cookers, and 
virtually all other appliances. (The full <a href="https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/enforcement/section-301-investigations/tariff-actions" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">list</a> of products targeted by the latest tariffs is 194-pages-long.) The 
increase in cost will represent an abrupt change for the worse after 
global trade liberalization had previously <a href="http://humanprogress.org/article.php?p=698" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lowered</a> the cost of many those same goods over the past decades.</p><p><br> The tariffs will thus target and raise the cost of appliances that have 
been key to women’s empowerment historically. Thanks in part to the 
affordability of everyday kitchen appliances, cooking has changed from a
 necessary, labor-intensive task to a largely optional activity in the 
United States. Back in the days of churning butter and baking one’s own 
bread, food preparation consumed as much time as a full-time job. But by
 2008, the average American <a href="https://nutritionj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2891-12-45" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">spent</a> around an hour on food preparation each day, and from the mid-1960s to 
2008, women more than halved the amount of time spent on food 
preparation. Yet women still cook more than men in the United States, 
and so any increase in the cost of kitchen appliances is a tax on items 
that women use the most.</p><p><br> As globalized market competition made household appliances increasingly 
affordable, it reduced the burden of housework, enabling more women to 
participate in the labor force and obtain economic independence In 1900,
 the average American woman spent nearly 47 hours a week on housework; 
by 2011, that had fallen to just over 26 hours a week. While some of 
that change can be explained by more equitable divisions of household 
labor, women’s housework hours have decreased faster than men’s have 
increased. In other words, a lot of the credit for freeing women’s time 
is owed to labor-saving technologies—and ultimately, to the 
market-driven innovation and global competition that make time-saving 
devices available and inexpensive. That is one reason why, as an 
upcoming policy paper of mine argues, markets have improved the lives of
 women even more so than for men.</p><p><br> Of course, women are far from the tariffs’ only victims. Trade wars 
increase costs for all Americans, and the latest round of tariffs will 
likely <a href="http://econweb.ucsd.edu/~vramey/research/Century_Update.xlsx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">slow down</a> the entire U.S. economy’s growth this year by 0.1 percentage point. 
That means fewer jobs and lower salaries in addition to higher prices.</p><p>Still, women have a particularly strong claim to offense regarding 
current U.S. trade policies. The administration should immediately 
deescalate the trade war, and return to the free trade goals that the 
president <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-suggests-dropping-all-tariffs-trade-barriers-at-g7-summit-2018-6" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">espoused</a> this summer. &#8220;No tariffs, no barriers, that&#8217;s the way it should be,&#8221; he
 opined at the time. Such a policy would indeed be far superior not only
 for economic growth and consumers’ wallets, but for the nation’s women.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.046457052230835-->