<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Federal judge rejects proposed global settlement against Weinstein]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/07/14/federal-judge-rejects-proposed-global-settlement-against-weinstein/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/07/14/federal-judge-rejects-proposed-global-settlement-against-weinstein/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/07/federal-judge-rejects-proposed-global-settlement-against-weinstein.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Federal judge rejects proposed global settlement against Weinstein</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge Tuesday rejected a proposed global settlement against Harvey Weinstein over concerns that his accusers&#8217; claims are too disparate for a class action.</p><p>&#8220;Women who have been raped are entitled to a much greater recovery than women who just met Harvey Weinstein,&#8221; ruled U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein during a hearing in Manhattan federal court Tuesday.&nbsp; &#8220;[The] settlement would create an equality among those people.&#8221;</p><p>The class action groups together staffers who were harassed by the former Miramax boss but not sexually molested &#8212; and women who&#8217;ve accused Weinstein of sexual assault and rape.</p><p>The judge&#8217;s decision comes after <strong>more than seven women objected</strong> to the proposed settlement that was <strong>touted last month</strong> by New York state Attorney General Letitia Janes, whose office helped negotiate it.</p><p>The deal earmarked about $19 million, minus attorneys&#8217; fees, for the victims. Lawyer Douglas Wigdor, who represents six women who objected to the settlement, had called it one-sided and unfair.</p><p>“[We] are pleased that Judge Hellerstein swiftly rejected the one-sided proposal,&#8221; Wigdor said of the deal that had been in the works for 18 months. &#8220;On behalf of our clients, we look forward to pursuing justice against Harvey Weinstein and his many enablers.”</p><p>Wigdor had argued in court papers that the settlement would have paid out a paltry $10,000 to $20,000 to a majority of the victims &#8212; while protecting Weinstein, his brother Robert Weinstein and The Weinstein Company shareholders.</p><p>The disgraced movie mogul was sentenced in March to <strong>23 years in prison</strong> after a Manhattan jury convicted him of rape and other charges.</p><p>More than 100 women have accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.026827096939087-->