<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Federal Appeals Court Rules California’s Ban on High-Capacity Magazines Unconstitutional]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/08/15/federal-appeals-court-rules-californias-ban-on-high-capacity-magazines-unconstitutional/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/08/15/federal-appeals-court-rules-californias-ban-on-high-capacity-magazines-unconstitutional/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 08:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/08/federal-appeals-court-rules-californias-ban-on-high-capacity-magazines-unconstitutional-national-review.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Federal Appeals Court Rules California’s Ban on High-Capacity Magazines Unconstitutional</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court on Friday overturned California’s ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines, ruling that the prohibition violates the Second Amendment.</p><p>“Even well-intentioned laws must pass constitutional muster,” Appellate Judge Kenneth Lee <strong>wrote</strong> for the majority on the three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, adding that California’s ban “strikes at the core of the Second Amendment — the right to armed self-defense.”</p><p>California’s ban on magazines holding more than 10 bullets is “so sweeping that half of all magazines in America are now unlawful to own in California,” Lee wrote.</p><p>One of the judges on the panel dissented, leaving a majority of two who voted to throw out the ban, which Lee wrote was passed “in the wake of heart-wrenching and highly publicized mass shootings.”</p><p>Gun rights groups celebrated the ruling. California Rifle &amp; Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel hailed the decision as “a huge victory” for Americans who own firearms “and the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.”</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.070662021636963-->