<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Fed Economist Suggests Country Could Hit 32 Percent Unemployment without Coronavirus Assistance]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/03/31/fed-economist-suggests-country-could-hit-32-percent-unemployment-without-coronavirus-assistance/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/03/31/fed-economist-suggests-country-could-hit-32-percent-unemployment-without-coronavirus-assistance/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/03/fed-economist-suggests-country-could-hit-32-percent-unemployment-without-coronavirus-assistance-national-review.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Fed Economist Suggests Country Could Hit 32 Percent Unemployment without Coronavirus Assistance</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure class="inline-image inline-image--captioned "><figcaption><em>Roy Coleman Jr., a personal trainer in Seattle, says he has been unable to file for unemployment due to a high volume errors on the government’s website, Everett, Wash., March 27, 2020.</em></p></figcaption></figure><p>An economist with the St. Louis Fed is projecting coronavirus could cost 47 million Americans their jobs, resulting in a 32.1 percent unemployment rate, eclipsing even St. Louis Fed President James Bullard’s dire 30 percent estimate.</p><p>“These are very large numbers by historical standards, but this is a rather unique shock that is unlike any other experienced by the U.S. economy in the last 100 years,” St. Louis Fed economist Miguel Faria-e-Castro <strong>explains</strong> in a blog post. Faria-e-Castro’s “back-of-the-envelope estimate” for unemployment in the second quarter of 2020 averages two different estimates of at-risk jobs due to social distancing to arrive at the 47 million prediction.</p><p>Faria-e-Castro caveats that his numbers don’t account for workers who may drop out of the labor force amid the pandemic — decreasing the reported unemployment rate. He also admittedly does not account for the effects of the <strong>recently-passed</strong> $2 trillion economic relief package, which includes direct cash payments and substantial unemployment benefits for most Americans.</p><p>Earlier this month, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin <strong>warned</strong> Republicans that the country could suffer 20 percent unemployment if the package was not passed.</p><p>Last week, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the country “may well be in a recession” after the Department of Labor <strong>reported</strong> an unprecedented 3.28 million surge in unemployment claims, more than quadruple the previous record for a single week.</p><p>“But I would point to the difference between this and a normal recession. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with our economy. Quite the contrary. We are starting from a very strong position,” Powell <strong>added</strong>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.048997163772583-->