<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Dem Senate Candidate Cal Cunningham Would Be ‘Hesitant’ to Receive Coronavirus Vaccine By Year’s End]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/09/15/dem-senate-candidate-cal-cunningham-would-be-hesitant-to-receive-coronavirus-vaccine-by-years-end/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/09/15/dem-senate-candidate-cal-cunningham-would-be-hesitant-to-receive-coronavirus-vaccine-by-years-end/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/09/dem-senate-candidate-cal-cunningham-would-be-hesitant-to-receive-coronavirus-vaccine-by-years-end-national-review.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Dem Senate Candidate Cal Cunningham Would Be ‘Hesitant’ to Receive Coronavirus Vaccine By Year’s End</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Senate candidate Cal Cunningham said Monday night that he would be “hesitant” to receive a coronavirus vaccine if one were available by year’s end, expressing concern that  “political and financial corruption” in Washington could mar the approval process.</p><p>“I’m going to ask a lot of questions,” he said in a debate against Republican incumbent Senator Thom Tillis (R., N.C.). “I think that’s incumbent on all of us right now with the way we’ve seen politics intervening in Washington.”</p><p>Tillis, who said he would get a vaccine, shot back, calling Cunningham’s remarks “irresponsible.”</p><p>“That statement puts lives at risk and it makes it more difficult to manage a crisis that he presents to say he’s up to the task to manage,” Tillis said. “We just heard a candidate for the U.S. Senate look into the camera and tell 10 million North Carolinians he would be hesitant to take a vaccine. I think that that’s irresponsible.”</p><p>Monday night’s <strong>debate</strong>, the first of three U.S. Senate debates, was moderated by WRAL anchor David Crabtree, who asked if the candidates would be willing to get a vaccine should one be approved by the end of the year which “could mean condensing timelines from years to months … with compromises and risks.”</p><p>“I think we have seen entirely too many times, and especially in recent years, politics intervening in what should be driven by health and science,” Cunningham said. “Historically and traditionally, I would support and have confidence in the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and the processes that they go through to approve a drug. But we have seen an extraordinary corruption in Washington.”</p><p>However, after the debate Cunningham clarified, “If public health professionals sign off, then I will not hesitate and I would encourage others to do so.”</p><p>After reports that the Centers for Disease Control had asked governors to prepare vaccine distribution sites by November 1, some critics raised skepticism over the safety and efficacy of a vaccine that had been developed and approved so quickly, particularly if a vaccine’s release should happen so close to the presidential election.</p><p>Several vaccines are in phrase-three trials as part of Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s effort to accelerate the development, manufacturing and distribution of coronavirus vaccines and treatments.</p><p>Tillis said he had “no doubt in my mind the vaccine would be safe,” calling the Food and Drug Administration “the gold standard.” The FDA would not approve a drug that was not safe for use by Americans, he said.</p><p>Much of the one-hour debate focused on the coronavirus pandemic as North Carolina has recorded more than 185,000 cases and more than 3,000 deaths from the virus.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.056414127349854-->