<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Candace Owens Responds to Harry Styles&#039; Clapback: &#039;Shots Fired&#039;]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/12/02/candace-owens-responds-to-harry-styles-039-clapback-039-shots-fired-039/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/12/02/candace-owens-responds-to-harry-styles-039-clapback-039-shots-fired-039/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/12/02/candace-owens-responds-to-harry-styles-039-clapback-039-shots-fired-039.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Candace Owens Responds to Harry Styles&#039; Clapback: &#039;Shots Fired&#039;</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[

						<figure id="attachment_1927106"  class="wp-caption alignnone"><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/12/02/candace-owens-responds-to-harry-styles-039-clapback-039-shots-fired-039-0.jpg" alt="Candace Owens Responds to Harry Styles' Clap Back: 'Shots Fired'" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text"><span class="caption">Candace Owens; Harry Styles.</span> <span class="credit">Michael Conroy/AP/Shutterstock; Richard Young/Shutterstock</span></figcaption></figure><p>She’s not backing down! <strong><strong>Candace Owens</strong></strong> responds to <strong><strong>Harry Styles</strong></strong>‘ clapback after she criticized his historical <em>Vogue</em> cover.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, December 2, the 26-year-old posted a picture of himself eating a banana in a pale blue suit to <strong>Instagram</strong>, writing, “Bring back manly men,” in the accompanying caption.</p>


<p>This slam was a direct response to Owens’ original criticism of the “Watermelon Sugar” singer’s December 2020 cover, in which Styles wears a Gucci ball gown as the first-ever solo male to cover American <em>Vogue</em>.</p>
<p>“There is no society that can survive without strong men,” she tweeted alongside <em>Vogue’s</em> cover story post on November 13. “The East knows this. In the west, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence. It is an outright attack. Bring back manly men.”</p>


<p>However, the conservative author is not bothered by Styles’ response. In fact, she’s kind of loving it. “When people try to tell me I don’t have influence, and then @Harry_Styles dedicates an entire post to my tweet,” she tweeted on Wednesday morning, sharing a screengrab of his Instagram. “I inspire global conversation. #BringBackManlyMen. Shots fired.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_1918317"  class="wp-caption alignnone"><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/12/02/candace-owens-responds-to-harry-styles-039-clapback-039-shots-fired-039-1.jpg" alt="Stars Defend Harry Styles' Vogue Cover Shoot After Candace Owens Slams It" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text"><span class="caption">Harry Styles on the cover of Vogue, December 2020.</span> </figcaption></figure><p>In another tweet she shared a picture of the British star in costume shooting <em>Dunkirk</em>, caked in mud and dirt. Alongside the snap she hashtagged a shorthand for bring back manly men back — #BBMM — alongside American and English flag emojis.</p>


<p>Styles didn’t just take to social media to clapback, though. He also discussed the drama in <em>Variety’s</em> Hitmakers issue, which hit newsstands on Wednesday.</p>

		<p>“To not wear [something] because it’s females’ clothing, you shut out a whole world of great clothes,” he said. “And I think what’s exciting about right now is you can wear what you like. It doesn’t have to be X or Y. Those lines are becoming more and more blurred.”</p>
<p><strong>Listen on Spotify to Get Tressed With Us to get the details of every hair love affair in Hollywood, from the hits and misses on the red carpet to your favorite celebrities’ street style ‘dos (and don’ts!)</strong></p>
<p><strong><strong> <iframe width="100%" height="232" frameborder="0" data-src="https://open.spotify.com/embed-podcast/show/48KHhadfgTKyGlV5AprQnI" class="optanon-category-C0002-C0003-C0004-C0005"></iframe></strong></strong></p>
						<p>This story originally appeared on: <strong>US Magazine</strong> - Author:<strong>Emily Rekstis</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Rekstis]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.048056125640869-->