<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Barack Obama’s Endorsement Might Do More Harm Than Good]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/04/15/barack-obamas-endorsement-might-do-more-harm-than-good/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/04/15/barack-obamas-endorsement-might-do-more-harm-than-good/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/04/overview-Barack-Obama.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">Barack Obama’s Endorsement Might Do More Harm Than Good</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama released a video endorsing Joe Biden  on Tuesday, which is more or less the final piece needed to solidify  the entire party’s decision to crown the former Vice President as Donald  Trump’s 2016 opponent.</p><p>Biden  didn’t really need Obama’s endorsement. Given what we’ve seen in terms  of support and coalescing around him, it appears that this was pretty  much baked into everyone’s calculations already. Further, when you see  what Obama had to say, it didn’t really come across as an endorsement but rather seemed forced, like it was something he had to do.</p><p>I’ve made the argument before that Obama would never have endorsed 
Sanders because a Sanders candidacy and presidency is a direct threat to
 Obama’s own legacy. Sanders’ entire campaign was premised on the idea 
that Obama didn’t go far enough and that you essentially have to destroy
 what he did and start over. As someone who is obsessed with legacy and 
his impact on history, Obama would never have that. So, he couldn’t 
endorse Sanders, but a lot of Sanders’ coalition is the same coalition 
Obama had to build in order to become president in the first place, so 
he couldn’t outright alienate them either.</p><p>To be honest, Obama 
didn’t have to do anything here. He has spent the better part of four 
years completely uninvolved in Democratic politics – and for good 
reason. The entire reason the Democrats don’t have much of a bench when 
it comes to viable candidates (that Joe Biden is the best they can do, 
given how erratic he’s been in public appearances says a lot) is because
 Obama was actually very bad at politics. He completely alienated so 
much of the country that the Democrats were virtually wiped out in 
several states and essentially had to start over.</p><p>They’ve been 
able to rebuild, sure, but there wouldn’t have been so much to rebuild 
if he had been better at keeping his disdain for everyone who disagreed 
with him in check. He vowed to use a “pen and a phone” in order to 
unconstitutionally seize power where Republicans wouldn’t give him any, 
he referred to a very large chunk of American voters as people who cling
 bitterly to their guns and Bibles, and he would frequently belittle 
anyone, even media allies, who would dare to question him. His ego was 
such that he thought his will was supreme and that people would just go 
along with it.</p><p>Plus, this could turn out to be a net negative for 
the Democrats. Sanders fans will be disappointed in him, moderates who 
went with Trump because they saw Hillary as a repeat of Obama will 
likewise be hesitant to pull the lever for Biden, and Biden will be 
unable to define himself as anything other than Obama’s Vice President. 
He is now stuck defending those same policies that led to massive 
Republican wins during Obama’s presidency.</p><p>Obama could not stay 
out of it, however, because ego, pride, and legacy are on the line. He 
has to make sure what he did remains intact. He would like to think he 
led a scandal-free presidency, but even if you took that claim as true, 
it is impossible to look at electoral results and think that his 
presidency wasn’t an overall net loss for the Democrats. His presence 
here could be just as devastating if Biden’s team isn’t careful.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[GAGmen]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.029742956161499-->