<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[$45 million isn’t the real problem for Dak Prescott and the Cowboys]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://usagag.com/2020/05/22/45-million-isnt-the-real-problem-for-dak-prescott-and-the-cowboys/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://usagag.com/2020/05/22/45-million-isnt-the-real-problem-for-dak-prescott-and-the-cowboys/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://usagag.com</generator>
        <media:content url="/uploads/2020/05/dak-prescott-dallas-cowboys-20201.jpg" medium="image">
            <media:title type="html">$45 million isn’t the real problem for Dak Prescott and the Cowboys</media:title>
        </media:content>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >It&#8217;s time, not money. </span></p><p><span >Multiple sources are refuting a report from NBC Sports&#8217; Chris Simms released on Thursday as &#8220;definitely not true&#8221; that the Cowboys quarterback turned down a five-year, $175 million deal &#8212; $35 million annually &#8212; because he wanted &#8220;north of $45 million&#8221; in the final year.</span></p><p>&#8220;To clarify any recent speculation on Dak Prescott’s contract negotiations: there have been no discussions on other scenarios other than the Cowboys wanting a longer deal and Prescott wanting a shorter deal, per source,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1263537030480433152" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ESPN&#8217;s Adam Schefter wrote</a>.</p><p>&#8220;According to the team side and Dak Prescott’s agent, the report (👇🏽) from @CSimmsQB is definitely not true,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1263539230434869250" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">NFL Network&#8217;s Ian Rapoport quote-tweeted</a>. &#8220;The two sides have never discussed such scenarios or anything like it. Dak wants a shorter deal, the #Cowboys want a longer one.&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;Nothing’s changed on his side,&#8221; USA Today&#8217;s Jori Epstein wrote. &#8220;Dak wants a four-year deal from Cowboys. He&#8217;s not entertaining offers of more than four years. Guarantees, structure of contract are important beyond potential max value 🤷&#8221;</p><p>The inflammatory information could have originated from some source within the Cowboys organization in an effort to sour public opinion against Prescott and force his hand. The franchise-tagged two-time Pro Bowler has been a divisive topic all offseason, and the optics of turning down a deal of that magnitude could have reflected poorly on him.</p><figure id="attachment_15707967"  class="wp-caption alignright"><strong><noscript><img data- data-src="/uploads/2020/05/dak-prescott-dallas-cowboys-20201.jpg" class="lazyload" src="" /><noscript><img  data-src="/uploads/2020/05/dak-prescott-dallas-cowboys-20201.jpg" /></noscript></noscript><img class="lazyload" src='data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=%22http://www.w3.org/2000/svg%22%20viewBox=%220%200%20210%20140%22%3E%3C/svg%3E' data- data-src="/uploads/2020/05/dak-prescott-dallas-cowboys-20201.jpg" /></strong><figcaption class="wp-caption-text"><span>Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott</span><span class="credit">Getty Images</span></figcaption></figure><p>Negotiations for a long-term contract have dragged on since last offseason, during which time the Cowboys completed deals with <strong>Demarcus Lawrence</strong>, <strong>Jaylon Smith</strong>, <strong>Ezekiel Elliott</strong>, <strong>Amari Cooper</strong> and <strong>Andy Dalton</strong>. Earlier in May, Stephen Jones, vice president and son of owner Jerry Jones, <strong>expressed concern about overburdening the team</strong> with such a significant cap liability for one player.</p><p>&#8220;There’s all sorts of analytics out there that show if your QB takes up too big a percentage of your salary cap that it decreases your chances to win,&#8221; the younger Jones told Pro Football Talk.</p><p>“For somebody to say you can only take so much because of the salary cap or you can only do this or that, I don’t know how fair that is to say,” Prescott <strong>told USA TODAY Sports last summer when negotiations first began</strong>.</p><p>The 2020 NFL salary cap is $198.2 million, a $10 million increase year-over-year.</p><p>“With gambling, with everything going into this league, everything is going to continue to keep going up,&#8221; Prescott said.&nbsp;“At the end of the day, when it’s all said and done, a year or two later, you’re not going to be the highest-paid. That’s just the way the game goes.”</p><p>Prescott has thrown for 15,778 yards, 97 touchdowns and 36 interceptions with a 65.8 completion percentage since entering the league as a 2016 fourth-round pick. He has earned an average of just $1 million per year over four seasons and will earn $31.5 million under the exclusive franchise tender.</p><p>The Cowboys and Prescott have until the July 15 deadline to agree to terms, or risk extending this rigamarole for another year which retired Eagles signal-caller Donovan McNabb thinks would be a short-sighted move on the team&#8217;s behalf.</p><p>“Pay the man because I’m going to tell you one thing — you franchise him, say he has half Jameis Winston’s season and y’all make it to the NFC Championship Game or second round of the playoffs. &#8230; You know how much money he’s going to ask for?&#8221; McNabb <strong>told on &#8220;The Last Stand&#8221; podcast</strong>. &#8220;You think it’s a problem now. It’s going to be a major problem if Deshaun Watson and Patrick Mahomes sign their contracts.&#8221;</p><p>The team would also have the expensive option to franchise tag the QB once again should they allow the July 15 mark to pass.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[USAGAG]]></dc:creator>
            </channel>
</rss><!--Time: 0.062905073165894-->